| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Coates v. City of Cincinnati ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Coates v. City of Cincinnati
''Coates v. Cincinnati'', 402 U.S. 611 (1971), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a local city ordinance that made it a criminal offense for three or more persons to assemble on a sidewalk and annoy passersby was unconstitutional.
== Background ==
In 1956 Cincinnati, Ohio passed an ordinance which provided that:
Coates, a student, participated in a demonstration and was convicted of violating the ordinance. Coates appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, alleging that the ordinance and his conviction violated the First and Fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution. Coates argued that the ordinance interfered with the first amendment protection of the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and that the ordinance as written was so vague that it violated the due process guarantees of the fourteenth amendment.〔''Coates v. Cincinnati'' 402 U.S. 612 (1971).〕 Relying on ''Cameron v. Johnson'', a divided court found that "annoying" was constitutionally vague and affirmed Coates' conviction.〔''Coates v. Cincinnati'' 402 U.S. 613 (1971).〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Coates v. City of Cincinnati」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|